tested only one
individual for most of the species examined, thus they
were likely to have underestimated Wolbachia infection.
Second, we examined Wolbachia infection frequency
in Southeast Asia, whereas previous reports
examined infection frequency mostly in the Americas
and Europe.tested only one
individual for most of the species examined, thus they
were likely to have underestimated Wolbachia infection.
Second, we examined Wolbachia infection frequency
in Southeast Asia, whereas previous reports
examined infection frequency mostly in the Americas
and Europe.tested only one
individual for most of the species examined, thus they
were likely to have underestimated Wolbachia infection.
Second, we examined Wolbachia infection frequency
in Southeast Asia, whereas previous reports
examined infection frequency mostly in the Americas
and Europe.tested only one
individual for most of the species examined, thus they
were likely to have underestimated Wolbachia infection.
Second, we examined Wolbachia infection frequency
in Southeast Asia, whereas previous reports
examined infection frequency mostly in the Americas
and Europe.tested only one
individual for most of the species examined, thus they
were likely to have underestimated Wolbachia infection.
Second, we examined Wolbachia infection frequency
in Southeast Asia, whereas previous reports
examined infection frequency mostly in the Americas
and Europe.tested only one
individual for most of the species examined, thus they
were likely to have underestimated Wolbachia infection.
Second, we examined Wolbachia infection frequency
in Southeast Asia, whereas previous reports
examined infection frequency mostly in the Americas
and Europe.